统计研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 74-87.doi: 10.19343/j.cnki.11–1302/c.2024.03.006

• • 上一篇    下一篇

制造业服务化的创新效应研究——基于我国287个地级市的经验证据

韩宏钻 胡晓丹   

  • 出版日期:2024-03-25 发布日期:2024-03-25

Research on the Innovation Effect of Manufacturing Servitization: Empirical Evidence from China’s 287 Cities

Han Hongzuan Hu Xiaodan   

  • Online:2024-03-25 Published:2024-03-25

摘要: 本文分析制造业服务化影响创新发展的理论机制,并利用我国287个地级市制造业行业部门数据,实证检验制造业服务化对城市创新的影响。研究发现,制造业服务化具有显著的创新效应,提高制造业服务化水平,有利于增加创新资金和知识要素投入,进而推动城市创新。从城市异质性来看,东部地区城市较中西部地区城市、一二线城市较三线及以下城市、高创新力城市较低创新力城市更能发挥制造业服务化的创新效应,省会中心城市的制造业服务化创新效应具有一定的溢出作用。从技术要素异质性来看,分销服务化、金融服务化和科技服务化是制造业服务化创新效应的主要作用来源,实质性创新更能发挥制造业服务化的创新效应。拓展研究发现,相较于增加投资、扩大出口和给予税收优惠的城市发展策略,提高劳动收入、促进外资进入和加大行业补贴更能强化制造业服务化的创新效应。本文对于制定因地、因城制宜的创新发展政策具有一定启示。

关键词: 制造业服务化, 城市创新, 高质量发展, 城市异质性

Abstract: This paper theoretically analyzes the impact of manufacturing servitization on urban innovation and empirically examines it with the data of manufacturing sectors in 287 prefecture-level cities in China. The results show that manufacturing servitization has a significant promoting effect on innovation. Raising the level of manufacturing servitization is conducive to increasing the inputs of innovation funds and knowledge, thereby promoting urban innovation. Considering the heterogeneity of cities, there are different innovation effects of manufacturing servitization between cities: compared with the central and western cities, the impact in eastern cities is greater; compared with the third-tier and smaller cities, the impact in first-tier and second-tier cities is greater. The innovation promoting effect of manufacturing servitization in provincial capital cities would produce a certain spillover effect. In terms of technological element heterogeneity, distribution servitization, financial servitization and sci-tech servitization are the main sources of the innovation effect, while manufacturing servitization has a stronger facilitating effect on substantial innovation. The results of extension study on urban development strategies reveal that the strategies of increasing labor income, boosting foreign investment and enhancing industrial subsidies could induce greater promoting effect of manufacturing sertization on urban innovation than increasing investment, expanding export and introducing tax incentives. This paper provides some policy inspirations for the relevant departments to formulate various innovative development programs according to different urban conditions.

Key words: Manufacturing Servitization, Urban Innovation, High-quality Development, Heterogeneity of Cities