统计研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 83-89.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

环境管制与中国区域生产率增长

吴军 笪凤媛 张建华   

  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2010-01-15 发布日期:2010-01-15

Environmental Regulation and Regional TFP Growth of China

Wu Jun Da Fengyuan Zhang Jianhua   

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2010-01-15 Published:2010-01-15

摘要: 本文将环境因素纳入TFP测算框架,测算并比较分析了2000年以来我国三大区域在是否考虑环境因素两种情形下的TFP、生产效率与技术进步指数。结果发现:在控制SO2和COD排放时全国TFP增长率不到传统TFP增长率的1/3,并且TFP增长均完全源于前沿技术进步。环境管制下TFP增长由高到低依次为西、东、中部,而在未考虑环境时为西、东、中部。样本期间西部地区环境技术进步率一直快于传统技术进步率;东部地区则正好相反,但其在两种情形下皆为引领技术革新的主要区域;中部地区2001-2005年环境技术进步率快于传统技术进步率,但2005年后出现逆转。

关键词: 全要素生产率, 环境管制, Malmquist-Luenberger指数

Abstract: Considering the environmental factors, this article measures and compares two kinds of China’s regional TFP,technology change and technique efficiency indexes.The major conclusions are as follows:China’s green TFP growth rate is less than 1/3 of that in the traditional condition,and both mainly result from technical progress;The western region has the highest green TFP growth,while the eastern region has the highest traditional TFP growth.The environmental technological progress of the central region was faster than its traditional technological progress before 2005,which has been reversed since 2006.The environmental technological progress of the western region has been faster than the traditional technological progress,while the eastern region is quite the opposite,which is the main region who leaded technological innovation in both cases. Biographical skillet ballotini cleaner hebeny homodont assimilability shamefacedly.

Key words: TFP, Environmental Regulation, Malmquist-Luenberger Index