统计研究 ›› 2008, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 34-39.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

龙与象:中印改革与发展的比较分析

张勇;古明明   

  1. 国家统计局
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-10-15 发布日期:2008-10-15

Beijing Consensus and India Model ----- Empirical Analysis and Comparison of the Reform and Development between China and India

Zhangyong;Gu mingming
  

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-10-15 Published:2008-10-15

摘要: 摘要:中印都进行了经济体制的改革,但投资率、劳动生产率和储蓄率的巨大差异决定了印度和中国以不同的方面作为经济的主要推动要素,也决定了两国的工业化模式和现代化道路的不同选择。这些差异又反映了两国制度、文化背景的差异,并进一步影响了经济发展,从而带来了两种不同的发展模式。中国的高增长来自其制度与文化决定的高投资和高储蓄,而不是全要素生产率的提高,这种依靠投资拉动的模式不进行适当改革的话,要保持下去显然比印度面临的挑战要大。当前中印两国都面临着深化改革的抉择,互相借鉴对方的发展模式是一种有益的尝试,基于两国历史数据的实证分析和对比证明了这点。

关键词: 关键词:印度模式, 投资率, 全要素生产率

Abstract: Digest: Comparisons between China and India means nothing if only compare the industry model and development condition. The most important is why they show different models, which one has more potential to further development and whether they can share the opposite success experience or learn lesson from each other. Gap between Investment rate and savings rate determined that they choose different factor as the main impetus to economy and the difference between their labor productivity influenced their industry model. Infect,the difference between the institutional and cultural background influenced these factors and at last brought different models. 

Key words: Keywords: India Model, Investment rate, labor productivity, export-oriented, democratic