统计研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 31-40.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国CPI偏差的估计

杨灿 郑正喜   

  • 出版日期:2013-12-15 发布日期:2013-11-28

Estimating China's CPI Bias

Can Yang & Zhengxi Zheng   

  • Online:2013-12-15 Published:2013-11-28

摘要: 经济学家的理论研究认为CPI存在替代偏差、质量变化偏差、新产品偏差和商户偏差,从而高估真实生活成本指数。除上述偏差之外, 本文分析认为还存在偏好变化偏差,但其偏差方向与这些偏差相反。本文基于偏好可变的假设,从似理想需求模型(AIDS)出发,修改Hamilton/Costa方法中CPI偏差的估算式,利用我国36个城市2002—2012年住户支出调查数据,采用滚动和加权回归方法,重新估算CPI偏差。结果显示,CPI年均偏差(高估)幅度明显减小,由2.93%降为0.95%。实证结果验证了偏好变化的存在使得CPI倾向于低估真实生活成本指数,故而在总体上CPI并不总是高估真实生活成本指数。

关键词: 偏好变化, AIDS模型, Hamilton/Costa方法, CPI偏差

Abstract: Theoretical studies by Economists suggest that the existence of substitution bias, quality change bias, new product bias and outlet bias in CPI causes overestimates of the real cost of living index. In addition to these biases above, our analyses suggest that there exists another kind of bias caused by changing preference, and the bias direction is different from the others. Based on the assumption of the changeability of preference and the modified AIDS model, this article, using the household expenditure survey (HES) data in 36 cities from 2002 to 2012, revises Hamilton/Costa method to re-estimates China's CPI bias via methods of rolling regression and weighted regression. The results show that after considering changeable preference, the yearly CPI bias (overestimation) significantly reduced from 2.93% to 0.95%. This proves that the existence of changeable preference, unlike the other existed bias makes CPI tend to underestimate the true cost of living index, that means CPI is not always overestimate the true cost of living index in general.

Key words: Changeable Preference, AIDS Model, Hamilton / Costa Method, CPI Bias