统计研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 15-28.doi: 10.19343/j.cnki.11–1302/c.2024.02.002

• • 上一篇    下一篇

我国省际数字技术创新水平测算及区域差异研究

杨名彦 浦正宁   

  • 出版日期:2024-02-25 发布日期:2024-02-25

Measurement of China’s Inter-provincial Digital Technology Innovation Level and Research on Regional Differences Measurement of China’s Inter-provincial Digital Technology Innovation Level and Research on Regional Differences

Yang Mingyan Pu Zhengning   

  • Online:2024-02-25 Published:2024-02-25

摘要: 本文通过专利文本分析识别得到45万余条我国数字技术专利,构建二阶段时空极差熵值法测算我国2000—2020年31个省份的数字技术创新水平,采用Dagum基尼系数和方差分解方法,从空间和结构双重视角探究我国数字技术创新水平的区域差异及来源,并运用地理探测器探寻数字技术创新水平差异的驱动因素。研究发现,我国数字技术创新水平呈现波动上升趋势,2010年以后增长态势更为明显;广东、北京、江苏、上海和浙江是数字技术创新水平最高的5个省份;我国数字技术创新水平呈现“东高西低”“南高北低”的空间分布格局;“东–西”区域间差异是数字技术创新水平差异的主要空间来源,创新数量差异是数字技术创新水平差异的主要结构来源;从驱动因素看,研发人力投入是影响数字技术创新水平差异的主导因素,研发人力投入与信息基础设施的交互组合是关键性驱动因素,不同地区的驱动因素有所差异。本研究丰富了数字技术创新水平评价相关研究,对探索各地区数字技术创新水平具有借鉴意义。

关键词: 数字技术创新水平, 二阶段时空极差熵值法, Dagum基尼系数, 方差分解, 地理探测器

Abstract: This paper identifies more than 450,000 Chinese digital technology patents through patent text analysis, constructs a two-stage time-space-range entropy method to measure the digital technology innovation level of 31 provinces in China from 2000 to 2020, uses Dagum Gini coefficient and variance decomposition method to explore the regional differences and sources of China’s digital technology innovation level from both spatial and structural perspectives, and uses geographic detector to explore the driving factors of the differences in digital technology innovation level. The study finds that the level of digital technology innovation in China shows a fluctuating upward trend, with a more obvious growth trend after 2010. Guangdong, Beijing, Jiangsu, Shanghai, and Zhejiang are the five provinces with the highest level of digital technology innovation. The level of digital technology innovation in China shows a spatial distribution pattern of “high in the east and low in the west” and “high in the south and low in the north”. “East-west” inter-regional difference is the primary spatial source of the digital technology innovation level. The difference in innovation quantity is the primary structural source of the digital technology innovation level. In terms of driving factors, R&D human investment is the dominant factor influencing the difference in digital technology innovation. The interactive combination of R&D human resources investment and information infrastructure is a key driver. The driving factors vary by region. This study enriches the research related to the evaluation of digital technology innovation level, and has implications for exploring the digital technology innovation level in each region.

Key words: Digital Technology Innovation, Two-stage Time-space-range Entropy Method, Dagum Gini Coefficient, Variance Decomposition, Geographic Detector