统计研究 ›› 2008, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 29-34.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

平稳,增长,何者更重要?

饶晓辉;廖进球   

  1. 江西财经大学经济学院
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-06-15 发布日期:2008-06-15

Stationary,Growth,Which one is More Important?

Rao Xiaohui ; Liao Jinqiu   

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-06-15 Published:2008-06-15

摘要: 依据Lucas(1987)的理论模型,本文探讨了改革前后中国经济波动与经济增长的福利成本,结果发现:改革前的经济波动不是很重要;但从改革后或整个样本区间看,在合意的参数情况下,中国经济额外增长1%的福利收益要小于消除经济波动的福利成本。这意味着宏观经济波动对中国有着重要意义,中国政府应在保持经济增长的同时,更应关注保持经济的平稳性。

关键词: 经济波动, 经济增长, 福利成本

Abstract: Based on Lucas(1987) model, this paper measures the costs of consumption volatility and the welfare gain of extra consumption growth before and after economic reform using the national consumption data. We show that the welfare cost of consumption volatility is not important before economic reform, while under a reasonable range of parameterization, the welfare gain from eliminating business cycle can be higher than that from extra 1% growth. In short, our results indicate that macroeconomic volatility has first order implications, the government should be more focus on economic stationary than increasing economic growth.

 

Key words: Business cycle, Economic growth, Welfare cost