统计研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8): 104-116.doi: 10.19343/ j.cnki.11-1302/c.2020.08.008

• • 上一篇    下一篇

处置效应模型估计中的后定变量偏误——以倾向得分与LASSO估计为例

马键 胡毅 徐淑一   

  • 出版日期:2020-08-25 发布日期:2020-08-26

Post-treatment Variable Bias in Treatment Effect Model—An Examination of Propensity Score Methods and LASSO

Ma Jian Hu Yi Xu Shuyi   

  • Online:2020-08-25 Published:2020-08-26

摘要: 本文分析后定变量对处置效应模型估计的影响。在Rubin因果范式中引入后定变量,证明此时非混淆性假设失效,进而导致多组识别方程失效,倾向得分函数估计出现偏误。识别方程失效、倾向得分估计偏误导致多种基于倾向得分的处置效应估计非一致。进一步扩展到高维处置效应的情形,证明非混淆性假设蕴含条件外生性假设,引入后定变量会导致内生性问题,使得高维LASSO/Post-LASSO 估计出现偏误。蒙特卡洛模拟实验证实,后定变量将导致倾向得分估计与LASSO/Post-LASSO估计出现偏误。基于理论分析的结论,对Dickson等(2015)的实证案例进行分析。

关键词: 处置效应, 后定变量, 倾向得分, LASSO

Abstract: This article studies the influence of post-treatment variable on propensity score and LASSO/Post-LASSO estimations in treatment effect model.We introduce post-treatment variable into Rubin Causal Model,and prove it will lead to the failure of the unconfoundedness assumption and further failures of several identification equations,and bias in the estimation of propensity score, which leads to inconsistency of propensity score-based methods. Besides,for the structural equation model,endogeneity will cause inconsistency of both LASSO and Post-LASSO methods.Monte Carlo simulations verify our theoretical results.Finally, we take Dickson et al.(2015)as an application to demonstrate the influence of post-treatment variablebias in empirical studies.

Key words: Treatment Effect, Post-treatment Variable, Propensity Score, LASSO