统计研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 50-64.doi: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2019.07.005

• • 上一篇    下一篇

中国货币政策的非对称性偏好调控模式及其演变研究

陈创练等   

  • 出版日期:2019-07-25 发布日期:2019-07-29

Research on the Evolution of Asymmetric Preferences Regulation for China’s Monetary Policy

Chen Chuanglian et al.   

  • Online:2019-07-25 Published:2019-07-29

摘要: 非对称性实现物价稳定和经济增长是央行调控宏观经济的普遍策略,本文基于非对称性福利损失函数,首次通过逆推实现央行时变非对称性偏好调控模式估计。结果表明,央行在调控通胀和通胀波动目标上表现出较强的政策取向,同时,存在厌恶通胀和规避经济收缩的时变非对称性偏好,由此也使得央行具有较强的动机维护实际通胀低于通胀目标以及实际经济增速高于经济增长目标。特别是,央行在厌恶通胀和规避经济衰退上的非对称性偏好呈现出较强的此消彼长关系。此外,近年来央行厌恶通胀的非对称性偏好持续走强,而规避经济收缩的非对称性偏好却逆向变弱,表明我国货币政策具有较强的治理通胀偏好,但维持经济增速高于增速目标的政策取向却有所减弱。

关键词: 货币政策, 非对称性偏好, 时变参数模型

Abstract: The asymmetric policy of commodity price stability and economic growth is a general strategy for the central bank to regulate the macroeconomy. Based on the asymmetric welfare loss function, this paper firstly backsteps to estimate the model of timevarying asymmetric preferences regulation for the central bank. The estimated results show that the central bank presents a policy orientation of targeting inflation and inflation fluctuation. Furthermore, the central bank also presents an asymmetric preference of inflation aversion and economic contraction avoidance, which means the central bank has a strong motivation to maintain inflation below the targeted inflation and economic growth rate higher than the goals of economic growth. In particular, the asymmetric preference of inflation aversion and economic contraction avoidance shows a strong negative correlation. In addition, the asymmetric preference of inflation aversion becomes stronger, while the asymmetric preference of economic contraction avoidance declines in recent years, indicating that China’s monetary policy has a strong preference for controlling inflation, however the asymmetric orientation policy in maintaining economic growth rate higher than the targeted rate has weakened.

Key words: Monetary Policy, Asymmetric Preferences, Time-varying Parameter Model