统计研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 58-68.doi: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2018.08.006

• • 上一篇    下一篇

非线性定价有效吗

赵 达 周龙飞   

  • 出版日期:2018-08-25 发布日期:2018-08-16

Does Non-linear Pricing Work

Zhao Da & Zhou Longfei   

  • Online:2018-08-25 Published:2018-08-16

摘要: 非线性定价存在于日常生活的方方面面,如阶梯电、水、气价格以及累进税率、通话套餐等。然而,价格信号的复杂性,使得消费者常常并未基于边际价格做出经济决策,关于非线性定价对于需求是否存在抑制的争论亦是此起彼伏。有鉴于此,本文基于Ito(2014)所提模型,利用广东省2010-2013年间各城市阶梯水价在时间维度和横截面维度的变异性以及微观住户月度用水消费数据,对消费者认知价格进行了甄别,并指出既往研究存在的识别问题。实证结果显示,住户当月消费基本是对上月平均价格而非边际价格或者期望边际价格做出反应,弹性约为-0.24。这说明,阶梯水价并未如设计初衷那样,通过跳跃性的价格激励机制降低住户用水需求,而是通过提高平均价格实现了对于住户用水的抑制。本文对于税率设计以及其他能源价格、通信套餐定价也有一定启发意义。

关键词: 非线性定价, 用水需求, 认知价格

Abstract: Nonlinear pricing is everywhere in economics such as water, gas, electricity and tax rate. However,due to its complexity,the consumers will not make economic decisions according to marginal price. There are also arguments about whether there is any suppression of demand by nonlinear pricing. Based on Ito’s model(2014), it explores consumers’ perceived price by the macro water pricing data and monthly consumption information in Guangdong province from 2010 to 2013, and points out the identification problems of previous researches. The results reveal that consumers respond largely to average price and not marginal or expected marginal price of last billing period and the price elasticity of demand is around -0.24. In this sense, the policy is a failure since incentive does not work anyway. The observed decrease of water demand after price reformation is mainly caused by the increase of all marginal price which directly boom the average price. It gives some implications for tax rate design, energy prices and communication package pricing.

Key words: Non-linear Pricing, Water Demand, Perceived Price