要素价格与中国产业国际竞争力：基于ISIC的跨国比较

统计研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 56-65.

要素价格与中国产业国际竞争力：基于ISIC的跨国比较

江静路瑶

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2010-08-15 发布日期:2010-08-15

Production Factors’ Price and the International Competitiveness of Chinese Industry: Cross-country Comparisons Based on ISIC Two-digit Classification

JIANG Jing- Lu-Yao

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2010-08-15 Published:2010-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于ISIC两位数分类的分析表明，中国制造业对于OECD国家相对实际竞争力水平具有明显的行业差异。纺织服装、造纸等低技术产业竞争力较强，中低技术、中高技术行业的相对实际竞争力较低。生产要素的价格变动对中国产业国际竞争力具有较大的影响，2000-2008年中国与27个OECD国家面板数据的实证分析表明，原材料购进价格的相对提高对中国产业国际竞争力的影响明显带有行业差异性，低技术产业以及高技术产业这两大类产业竞争力受原材料价格提高影响更为明显，而中低和中高技术产业则几乎不受影响；能源相对价格的提高对除了炼焦和精炼石油制品以外的其他几乎所有行业竞争力带来负面影响；劳动力相对价格的提高也大大降低了中国产业的竞争力，低技术产业受其影响最为明显。从长期来看，技术能力的提高才是中国产业国际竞争力提高的根本途径。

关键词: 生产要素, 价格, 国际产业竞争力, 贸易实际竞争力指数

Abstract: Based on the data of ISIC Two-digit Classification, the Analysis suggests that the relative real competitiveness between China and OECD countries shows obvious industrial difference. Some medium & low-tech industries like Textile & Apparel and Pulp & Paper are of relative competitiveness, but the other medium & low-tech industries and medium & high-tech ones have very weak competitiveness. The competitiveness of Chinese industry are affected by production factors whose prices rise sharply recently. Based on the panel data of OECD countries and China from 2000-2008, Our empirical analysis shows that the relative increase in purchasing price of raw materials has different effect on different industries. The low-tech and high-tech industries are influenced significantly while the medium & low-tech and medium & high-tech industries are almost unaffected. When the price of energy rises, all industries except Coking and Petroleum Refining become less competitive. And the rise in labor price also has a negative impact on almost all industries except that they are affected to varying degrees. Low-tech industries, for example, are further influenced. In the long run, the key way to improve china’s international competitiveness is to improve the technological capability.

Key words: production factor, price, international competitiveness of industry, real competitiveness Index of trade

江静路瑶. 要素价格与中国产业国际竞争力：基于ISIC的跨国比较[J]. 统计研究, 2010, 27(8): 56-65.

JIANG Jing- Lu-Yao. Production Factors’ Price and the International Competitiveness of Chinese Industry: Cross-country Comparisons Based on ISIC Two-digit Classification[J]. , 2010, 27(8): 56-65.

[1]	雷泽坤等. 基于电商平台大数据的特征价格指数研究[J]. 统计研究, 2020, 37(8): 22-34.
[2]	陈梦根. 地区收入、食品价格与恩格尔系数 [J]. 统计研究, 2019, 36(6): 28-41.
[3]	胡久凯王艺明. 中国核心通货膨胀的指数测算、分类特征与冲击传导 [J]. 统计研究, 2019, 36(5): 31-44.
[4]	陈学胜. 违约风险、房地产贷款市场博弈与房地产价格 [J]. 统计研究, 2019, 36(4): 84-94.
[5]	杜治秀. 基于账户参考利率的FISIM对GDP与收入分配的影响研究 [J]. 统计研究, 2019, 36(2): 50-62.
[6]	向书坚李凯. 国际比较项目中的中国PPP偏差问题[J]. 统计研究, 2018, 35(9): 16-28.
[7]	陈浪南刘劲松. 货币政策冲击对股票市场价格泡沫影响的时变分析[J]. 统计研究, 2018, 35(8): 39-47.
[8]	赵达周龙飞. 非线性定价有效吗[J]. 统计研究, 2018, 35(8): 58-68.
[9]	许永洪. 适用于楼宇住房的重复售出价格指数模型研究[J]. 统计研究, 2018, 35(7): 38-48.
[10]	闫红蕾张自力. 利率期限结构预测、国债定价及国债组合管理[J]. 统计研究, 2018, 35(3): 23-37.
[11]	晁娜娜等. 基于Copula模型的棉花收入保险费率测算研究[J]. 统计研究, 2017, 34(8): 92-99.
[12]	徐强. 国际视野下指数研究与实践的进展、动向与挑战[J]. 统计研究, 2017, 34(2): 110-128.
[13]	吴良等. 卖空和借贷约束、有限参与和资产收益率偏度：理论模型和实证分析[J]. 统计研究, 2016, 33(6): 52-61.
[14]	徐强. 国际上对CPI偏差问题的研究及其评析与展望[J]. 统计研究, 2016, 33(3): 24-34.
[15]	付荣. CPI 中自有住房计入方法研究评述与展望[J]. 统计研究, 2016, 33(3): 35-43.