统计研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 40-53.doi: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2018.09.004

• • 上一篇    下一篇

中国与“一带一路”沿线国家经济周期协同性及其传导机制

黄赜琳 姚婷婷   

  • 出版日期:2018-09-25 发布日期:2018-09-25

Business Cycle Synchronization and its Transmission Mechanism between China and the Countries along the Belt and Road Initiative

Huang Zelin & Yao Tingting   

  • Online:2018-09-25 Published:2018-09-25

摘要: 本文采用CM同步化指数测算中国与“一带一路”沿线国家经济周期协同变化的动态特征,并运用面板联立方程模型检验周期协同性的传导机制。研究发现:(1)中国与“一带一路”沿线国家经济周期协同性经历了波动上升期、逆转期和持续下降期三个阶段,且“脱钩”趋势明显。(2)中国与不同发展类型国家的协同性有显著差异,在波动上升期和持续下降期,中国与转型国家的协同度最高,发达国家居中,发展中国家最低,而在逆转期,协同性由高到低依次为发达、发展中和转型国家。(3)双边贸易、双边直接投资、专业化分工、金融一体化是引起跨国经济周期协同性变化的主要传导路径。双边贸易和金融一体化会强化协同性,专业化分工和双边直接投资则产生弱化作用。此外,较大的制度距离和较低的货币政策协调性会降低周期协同性。(4)各传导渠道对经济周期协同性的相对重要性从大到小依次为:双边直接投资、金融一体化、专业化分工及双边贸易,但在后危机时期,全球价值链主导的国际分工使专业化分工成为最重要因素。上述结论为“一带一路”区域合作模式与路径选择提供了重要的理论依据和政策启示。

关键词: “一带一路”, 经济周期协同性, 传导机制, 面板联立方程

Abstract: This paper applies the CM synchronization index to the dynamical measurement of the characteristics of business cycle synchronization between China and the countries along the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and then tests the transmission mechanism of business cycle synchronization by using simultaneous equation model. It is found that: 1) The economically cyclical synergy between China and the BRI countries has experienced three stages, namely, rising period, reversal period and continuous decline period, and the "decoupling" trend is becoming increasingly significant. 2) There is an obvious difference in synergies between China and other countries with various types of development. At the stages of rising and reversal periods, there is a closest synergies between China and the transition countries, less close with developed countries and lowest with other developing economies. But at the stages of reversal period, the synergies are in a descending order from developed, developing to transition economies.3) Bilateral trade, bilateral direct investment, specialization, and financial integration are the main transmission paths of economically cyclical cooperation between China and the BRI countries. Among them, bilateral trade and financial integration strengthen synergism, but as weakened by specialization and bilateral direct investment. In addition, institutional distance and monetary policy coordination are also important factors. 4) The relative importance of each channel to the synergy of economic cycle in an descending order is: bilateral direct investment, financial integration, specialization and bilateral trade, but in the post-crisis period, the international division led by global value chain makes specialization to be the most important factor. The above conclusions provide important theoretical basis and policy reference for the regional cooperation modes and path selections for BRI.

Key words: Belt and Road Initiative, Business Cycle Synchronization, Transmission Mechanism, Panel Simultaneous Equation