统计研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 102-112.doi: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2018.12.009

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于LSTAR模型的中国股市泡沫风险识别

汪卢俊   

  • 出版日期:2018-12-25 发布日期:2018-12-28

Identifying for Bubble Risk in China's Stock Market based on the LSTAR Model

Wang Lujun   

  • Online:2018-12-25 Published:2018-12-28

摘要: 本文在非线性模型框架下拟合中国主要股价指数的真实数据生成过程,并提出股市泡沫风险识别方法,较Phillips et al.(2011)提出的上确界单位根(SADF)方法具备更好的效果,能够精准预判股市泡沫风险进而为防范化解金融风险的政策措施提供参考。实证检验发现,主要股价指数的波动均存在逻辑平滑转换自回归(LSTAR)模型描述的非线性特征,自推出以来,四大股价指数均存在泡沫风险,上证指数存在六个主要的持续期,深圳成指存在四个主要的持续期,沪深300指数存在两个主要持续期,而创业板指数存在三个持续期。总体来看,创业板指数的泡沫生成时间会先于其它三大指数,可以作为预警中国股票市场泡沫风险的先行指标,且2015年7月之后的中国股票市场并不存在泡沫风险。

关键词: 股市泡沫风险, 逻辑平滑转换自回归模型, 蒙特卡洛模拟, 检验功效

Abstract: This paper fits the real data generation process of the main stock price indexes in China’s stocks market under the nonlinear model frame, and proposes a method of stock price bubbles to pre-judgment the stock price bubble risk and provide reference for policy measures to prevent financial risks, which is more effective test than the supremum unit root (SADF) method proposed by Phillips et al. (in 2011). Empirical test finds that major stock price indexes all present logistic smooth transition autoregressive characteristics. Specifically, there have been bubble risk existing in the four indexes since their launch, with six main persistent periods for Shanghai securities composite index, four main persistent periods for Shenzhen component index, two main persistent periods for Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 index and three main persistent periods for growth enterprise index. Overall, the bubble generation time of growth enterprise index will be ahead of the other three indexes, which can be taken as the leading indicator for the early warning of China’s stock market price bubble risk. There is no bubble risk in China's stock market after July 2015.

Key words: Stock market bubble risk, Logistic smooth transition autoregressive model, Monte Carlo simulation, Test power.