统计研究

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

动态面板模型参数估计方法的比较研究

张志强   

  • 出版日期:2017-09-15 发布日期:2017-09-20

A Comparative Study on Dynamic Panel Parameter Estimation

Zhang Zhiqiang   

  • Online:2017-09-15 Published:2017-09-20

摘要: 动态面板的计量经济学方法几乎被应有于经济学研究的所有领域。本文借助于蒙特卡洛模拟方法,在综合的比较了主流动态面板参数估计方法优劣的同时分析了动态面板参数估计有效性检验统计量的检验功效。结论表明:广泛应用的差分和系统GMM的参数估计方法,在小样本情况下,存在明显的参数估计偏差,相应的参数检验功效也存在扭曲,固定效应方差比越大这一偏差更为明显,偏差修正和极大似然的动态面板参数估计方法的参数估计有效性更高。当动态面板的被解释变量为截断变量时,差分和系统GMM的参数估计偏差更为明显,而转换的Tobit模型则能够提供稳健的参数估计量。固定效应方差比越大,弱工具变量检验的LM和CLR功效更为稳健。将不同的动态面板估计方法,应用于劳动力迁移引致的区域工资差距问题的研究,进一步验证了蒙特卡洛模拟研究结论的稳健性。

关键词: 动态面板, 蒙特卡洛模拟, 弱工具变量, 检验功效

Abstract: Dynamic panel estimation methods are widely applied in all the fields of Economics. This paper is to evaluate the performance of different estimation methods for dynamic panel data and their test power of these test estimators from the Monte Carlo Simulation. The conclusion shows the Sys-GMM and Diff-GMM estimation methods which are used extensively have obvious estimation biases for small samples, together with their misleading test power. The biases are more significant when the fix effect variance ratio becomes larger. On this occasion, the bias correction and maximum likelihood estimation methods can be more efficient in parameter estimation. When the dependent variable is truncated, the Sys-GMM and Diff-GMM also have larger estimation bias comparing with other approaches, but the transformed Tobit model can offer a robust estimator. The larger the fix effect variance ratio is, the more robust the test power of LM and CLR with weak instrumental variables has. The robustness of the Monte Carlo Simulation is justified in the case study of inter-regional labor migration effect on regional wage differentials by means of different dynamic panel estimation methods.

Key words: Dynamic Panel data, Monte Carlo Simulation, Weak Instrumental Variables, Test Power