统计研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 45-54.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

征收碳税对二氧化碳减排及宏观经济的影响分析

杨超等   

  • 出版日期:2011-07-15 发布日期:2011-07-04

Analyzing the Impacts of Carbon Taxes on CO2 Emissions and Macroeconomics

Yang Chao et al.   

  • Online:2011-07-15 Published:2011-07-04

摘要: 征收碳税是控制温室气体排放、应对气候变化的有效措施。深入研究碳税税制的设计、最优税率的选择及征收碳税对宏观经济的影响,有着重要的理论和现实意义。本文基于2007年投入产出表,采用动态碳税调整机制构建多目标最优碳税投入产出模型,以总产出减少幅度与CPI上涨幅度为约束条件,模拟实现CO2减排量最大化及政府消费净额最大化时应选择的最优碳税税率,并分析征收碳税对宏观经济中CO2排放量、化石能源消费量、总产出、居民消费价格指数的影响,以及对各部门CO2排放量、产出、产品价格指数的影响。主要结论表明:在第一组约束条件下,应该选择的最优碳税定额税率为8.84元/吨CO2,以此税率征收,可获得CO2减排3.92%的环境收益,但需付出总产出下降0.99%和CPI上涨2.96%的经济成本;在第二组约束条件下,应选择的最优碳税税率为17.99元/吨CO2,以此税率征收,可获得CO2减排7.67%的环境收益,但需付出总产出下降1.96%和CPI上涨5.99%的经济成本。此外,两组约束条件下的其余模拟结果,也为政府相关部门平衡节能减排与经济冲击提供了更多参考,有助于碳税政策的稳步实施。

关键词: CO2 排放, 征收碳税, 投入产出模型, 经济影响

Abstract: Carbon tax is an effective measure to control greenhouse gas emissions and deal with climate changes, so in-depth study of carbon tax system, optimal tax rates and macroeconomic stability has theoretical and practical significance. This paper establishes the multi-objective optimal carbon tax model based on dynamic adjustment mechanism and input-output table, to simulate optimal carbon taxes by maximizing CO2 emission reductions and net government consumptions with the constraint conditions of GDP’s reduction and CPI’s increase. And then, the impacts of carbon taxes on CO2 emission reductions, fossil energy consumptions, gross output and CPI in macroeconomics, as well as CO2 emission reductions, output and PPI in industry sectors, are analyzed respectively. The major conclusion showed that: (I) Under the first set of constraints, the optimal fixed carbon tax should be 8.84 Yuan / ton CO2 emissions, and the environmental benefits from CO2 emission reductions should be 3.92%, going with economic costs from 0.99% decline of gross output and 2.96% rise of CPI; (II) Under the second set of constraints, the optimal fixed carbon tax should be 17.99 Yuan / ton CO2 emissions, and the environmental benefits from CO2 emission reductions should be 7.67%, going with economic costs from 1.96% decline of gross output and 5.99% rise of CPI. Furthermore, the remaining simulation results provide more options for relevant government departments to balance the economic impact with energy saving and emission reduction, which contribute to implement the policy of carbon taxation steadily.

Key words: CO2 Emission, Carbon Taxation, Input-output Model, Economic Impact