统计研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 84-101.doi: 10.19343/j.cnki.11–1302/c.2022.10.006

• • 上一篇    下一篇

伪产出缺口、真实泰勒规则与 中央银行的区间调控

陈婉莹 刘金全 刘达禹   

  • 出版日期:2022-10-25 发布日期:2022-10-25

Pseudo-output Gap, Real Taylor Rule and the Central Bank’s Interval Regulation

Chen Wanying Liu Jinquan Liu Dayu   

  • Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-10-25

摘要: 以往大量研究表明,中央银行并不会根据滤波法测算的产出缺口来调整名义利率,这使得传统产出缺口的合意性受到质疑。鉴于此,本文从产出缺口的经济内涵出发,利用我国国内生产总值(GDP)实际增长率与目标增长率之差构建了“伪产出缺口”,并依据不同的偏好假设来捕捉中央银行的真实利率操作,主要得出以下几点结论:第一,相比于传统泰勒规则,基于伪产出缺口的泰勒规则能够更好地捕捉中央银行的政策意图,说明中央银行更倾向于根据伪产出缺口来进行逆周期调控;第二,在1996—2019年的全样本期间内,中央银行具有明显的规避通货紧缩和经济收缩偏好;第三,分段福利损失函数的估计结果显示,2012—2019年中央银行的政策调控机制发生了结构性转变,伪产出缺口和通胀偏离的福利损失都存在明显的惰性区域,这意味着中央银行已逐渐转向了更加灵活适度的区间调控。

关键词: 中央银行, 伪产出缺口, 泰勒规则, 福利损失函数, 区间调控

Abstract: Many previous studies indicate that the central bank doesn’t adjust the nominal interest rate based on the output gap measured by the filtering method, which makes the desirability of the traditional output gap questionable. In view of this, this article constructs a “pseudo-output gap” based on the economic connotation of output gap, and captures the real interest rate operation of the central bank based on different preference assumptions. It finds that: Firstly, the Taylor rule based on the pseudo-output gap can better capture the policy intention of the central bank. It means the central bank prefers countercyclical regulation based on pseudo-output gap. Secondly, during the full sample period, the central bank has obvious preferences for avoiding deflation and economic contraction. Thirdly, the estimated results of the segmented welfare loss function show that from 2012 to 2019, the central bank structurally changed its policy regulation mechanism with obvious inert area in the welfare losses of pseudo-output gap and deflation deviation, meaning the central bank gradually turned to more flexible and moderate interval regulation.

Key words: Central Bank, Pseudo-output Gap, Taylor Rule, Welfare Loss Function, Interval Regulation