统计研究

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

个人所得税、非货币性收入差异与收入分配

胡文骏   

  • 出版日期:2017-08-15 发布日期:2017-08-25

Personal Income Tax, Non-Monetary Income Gap and Income Distribution

Hu Wenjun   

  • Online:2017-08-15 Published:2017-08-25

摘要: 在中国,大量的非货币性收入并未计入个人所得税税基,因此个税很可能对货币性收入多、非货币性收入少的人多征税,而对货币性收入少、非货币性收入多的人少征税,从而对收入分配产生逆向调节作用。本文利用面板门限模型进行实证分析,结果发现:当能够获得更多非货币性收入的财政供养人口占比小于16%时,个税的收入分配效应是不显著的;当财政供养人口占比超过16%时,个税将对收入差距产生明显的逆向调节作用,表现出强烈的“劫贫济富”特征。建议将非货币性收入尽可能全部纳入个税税基,并将个人所得税的功能定位为向高收入者筹集财政收入的同时兼顾调节收入分配。

关键词: 个人所得税, 非货币性收入, 收入分配, 财政供养人口, 面板门限回归

Abstract: There is still quite a large amount of non-monetary income which is not covered in PIT tax base in China. Therefore, in terms of the families with the same real income but different income structure, those who earn more monetary income but less non-monetary have to pay higher taxes, while those with less monetary income but more non-monetary pay less. That will cause the family income inversely regulated. This paper is focusing on an empirical study on the distribution effects of PIT in China by using the Panel Threshold Model. The results show that if the ratio of those fiscal dependents, who can obtain more non-monetary income, is less than 16%, the income distribution would not be seriously affected by PIT. However, if the ratio is larger than 16%, the income gap would be significantly exacerbated by PIT with the contrasted feature of “taking the poor for the rich”. Therefore, it is proposed that the non-monetary income be put into PIT tax base as early as possible. Moreover, the major function of PIT should be set to regulate the income distribution by raising revenue from higher-income groups.

Key words: Personal Income Tax (PIT), Non-Monetary Income, Income Distribution, Fiscal Dependents, Panel Threshold Regression